Join Our Newsletter





Events Calendar

« < May 2017 > »
S M T W T F S
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
Home arrow Market Research Findings arrow Beauty and Cosmetics arrow Copycat cosmetics cash in on premium brands
Copycat cosmetics cash in on premium brands PDF Print E-mail
Written by Euromonitor International   
20 Feb 2006

Copycat cosmetics cash in on premium brands, by Euromonitor International

Manufacturers are acutely aware of the threat posed by counterfeit cosmetics on brand value and consumer safety, making them eager to rally for tighter regulations to inhibit grey market sales. However, grey market fakes aren't the only pretenders. According to Euromonitor International, premium brands are also being threatened by a growing number of imitation products from increasingly sophisticated but legitimate cut-price copycats.

Though the popularity of premium cosmetics stands tall, with Euromonitor International valuing that market at US$57 billion in 2004, not everyone can afford the genuine article. This has created a large market for status personal care products at cost price, generating sustained consumer demand for counterfeit cosmetics and toiletries.

China is one the world's largest country markets for premium personal care in terms of per capita spend, but is also a trouble hot-spot for counterfeit cosmetics. Leading personal care giant Procter & Gamble estimates that counterfeit goods in China cost it more than 10% in lost revenue. The China Consumers' Association (CCA) claims that smuggled and fake cosmetics dominate complaints by consumers, highlighting the fact that grey market cosmetics are also unsafe; having side-stepped the rigorous testing procedures required of legitimate personal care items.

Burberry – a case in point
As well as being potentially harmful to the people that use counterfeit cosmetics, parallel market personal care also damages brand reputation. The story of the Burberry fashion brand provides a case in point of the damage that can be wreaked on brand value - and profits - by fake goods. Burberry's dip in UK sales has been largely attributed to the use of the signature Burberry plaid on knock-off merchandise, which has now become synonymous with the working class 'chav' culture. With its brand identity having taken a distinctly down-market turn in its native UK, the label has now been forced to turn its attentions to less-tarnished overseas markets.

The brand is king
Building brands that consumers trust and identify with is big business. Recent big-budget international campaigns, such as Unilever's Dove Campaign for Real Beauty, have promoted an umbrella brand, as opposed to a specific product. This reflects the ongoing trend for manufacturers to slim down their brand portfolios to focus on a handful of megabrands rather than a wide range of individual products. The resulting megabrands rely heavily on maintaining a positive brand image, making them more vulnerable to wide-scale damage from counterfeiters.

For some time, manufacturers have legitimately cashed in on the strength of other brands by partnering up with them. Examples of successful brand partnerships include Braun with Oral-B, and Sally Hansen with Teflon. However, a less mutually beneficial method is gaining momentum. Instead of partnering with a brand, a new wave of legitimate copycat products is cashing in on established brand identities, offering nothing new except a reduced price.

Brand parasites
Like grey market counterfeits, these legitimate brand parasites tap into the consumer's desire to buy into an established brand identity at a reduced cost. Early success of this cut-price marketing strategy was evident in the 1980s. Primo, from Parfums de Coeur, grew to be one of the best-selling mass-market fragrances of the era by 'piggybacking' on the success of the premium Giorgio scent, which was only available in department and speciality stores. Primo packaging touted the slogan, "If you like Giorgio, you'll love Primo."

Current trend analysis suggests that today's consumer is even keener to pick up a bargain. Recent mainstream media reports have identified the emergence of PRAVs (Proud Realisers of Added Value); a burgeoning group who no longer believes that expensive is better. Snubbing designer labels in favour of cheaper items, they not only seek value for money items but enjoy gloating about their savings, which can only be good news for the cut-price copycats.

In addition, legislation from May 1996 states that it is now mandatory for manufacturers to list ingredients on the exterior packaging of all cosmetic products, giving savvy consumers a means of comparing content. Copycat products are exploiting these regulations by ensuring their active ingredients are comparable to those listed on their premium label counterparts.

In the US, brand parasites are becoming increasingly sophisticated, not just cloning formulations, but entire brand identities. Generix Laboratories' specialises in "providing affordable generic versions of the world's most popular formulations" and its Nulexin brand claims to have the same under-eye dark circle prevention ingredients as the original Klein-Becker Hylexin brand. The ingredients, product names, packaging, and even websites are strikingly similar; the key difference being that Nulexin has a drugstore RRP of US$39.99 versus the US$95 price tag for original Hylexin product.

Future of cut-price copycat products looks strong
While tightened regulations will continue to challenge grey market counterfeits, the producers of cut-price copycats are cleverly using these very safeguards as a marketing tool to legitimise their own offerings and place them ever closer to their high-end counterparts. Euromonitor International predicts that overtly piggybacking on the success of expensive megabrand marketing campaigns is set to pay dividends for these increasingly sophisticated brand parasites.

For further detail about this article and other related findings, please visit  Euromonitor International by clicking here.

Last Updated ( 08 Jan 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Polls

How important is market research to start-ups in the current economic climate?
 

RSS Feeds

Subscribe Now