|
ROCHESTER, N.Y. – March 17, 2005 – More than a quarter (29%)
of U.S. adults report that they or a member of their family received a
second medical opinion from a doctor in the past five years. In the
majority of cases, this second opinion either confirmed the initial
diagnosis or treatment (54%), or while different, did not change the
treatment (16%). However, in fully 30 percent of cases where a second
opinion was obtained, the diagnosis differed from the original, and as
a result, the treatment or care was different from what it would have
been without the second opinion.
These are some of the results of a Harris Interactive?
online survey of 2,137 U.S. adults conducted between March 4 and 8,
2005 for The Wall Street Journal Online’s Health Industry Edition.
Of those who received a second medical opinion from another doctor,
half (50%) said that they obtained one because they wanted to have as
much information as possible. Other reasons for getting a second
opinion included:
- The diagnosis was very serious (38%);
- The doctor who made the initial diagnosis suggested a second opinion (34%);
- Was not confident about the initial diagnosis (34%);
- There were several treatment options to choose from (25%);
- Did not trust the doctor who made the initial diagnosis (16%);
- The initial diagnosis was confusing (13%);
- Health insurance required a second opinion (10%); and
- Some other reason (9%).
Of the 71 percent of all adults and their families who have not
received a second opinion from another doctor in the past five years,
the most common reasons for deciding not to get one were that they
trusted the doctor who made the diagnosis (39%) and that they felt
confident about the initial diagnosis. Nearly (46%) said that a second
opinion from another doctor just wasn’t necessary.
TABLE 1
EVER HAD A SECOND OPINION?
"Has there been a time in the past five years when
you or a member of your family was diagnosed with a medical problem for
which you got a second medical opinion from another doctor?"
Base: All Adults
|
? |
Total |
| ? |
% |
|
Yes, received a second opinion from another doctor |
29 |
|
No, did not receive a second opinion from another doctor |
71 |
TABLE 2
REASONS WHY A SECOND OPINION WAS OBTAINED
"Patients and their family members get second
opinions for a variety of reasons. Why did you/your family member
decide to get a second opinion on the last occasion this happened?"
Base: Received a Second Opinion from Another Doctor
| ? |
Total |
| ? |
% |
|
Wanted to have as much information as possible |
50 |
|
The diagnosis was very serious |
38 |
|
The doctor who made the initial diagnosis suggested a second opinion |
34 |
|
Was not confident about the initial diagnosis |
34 |
|
There were several treatment options to choose from |
25 |
|
Did not trust the doctor who made the initial diagnosis |
16 |
|
The initial diagnosis was confusing |
13 |
|
Health insurance required a second opinion |
10 |
|
Some other reason |
9 |
Note: Multiple-response question.
TABLE 3
EFFECT OF SECOND OPINION
"The last time you/your family member received a second opinion, which of the following best describes what happened?"
Base: Received a Second Opinion from Another Doctor
| ? |
Total |
| ? |
% |
|
The second opinion confirmed the first diagnosis or recommended treatment. |
54 |
|
The Second Opinion Was Different (NET) |
46 |
| The
second opinion was different and, as a result, the treatment or care
was different from what it would have been without the second opinion. |
30 |
| The second opinion was different in some way but it did not change the treatment and care. |
16 |
TABLE 4
REASONS FOR NOT GETTING SECOND OPINION
"Patients and their family members decide not to get
a second opinion for a variety of reasons, why did you/your family
member decide not to get a second opinion?"
Base: Did Not Receive a Second Opinion from Another Doctor
| ? |
Total |
| ? |
% |
|
Trusted the doctor who made the initial diagnosis |
39 |
|
Felt confident about the initial diagnosis |
33 |
| Could not afford to pay for a second opinion |
7 |
| Health insurance would not pay for a second opinion |
6 |
| There wasn’t enough time to get a second opinion |
4 |
| Did not know where to go for a second opinion |
4 |
|
The doctor who made the initial diagnosis said a second opinion wasn’t necessary |
2 |
| A second opinion just wasn’t necessary |
46 |
| Some other reason |
19 |
Note: Multiple-response question.
J030405
Q905, Q910, Q915, Q920
Downloadable PDFs of Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Health-Care Polls are posted at http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters_wsj.asp.
Methodology
This poll was conducted online in the United States between March 4
and 8, 2005 among a nationwide cross section of 2,137 adults aged 18
and over. Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income and
region were weighted where necessary to align with population
proportions. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for
respondents’ propensity to be online.
In theory, with probability samples of this size, one could say with
95 percent certainty that the results for the overall sample have a
sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Sampling error for
the results of adults or their family members who received a second
opinion in the past five years (664) is plus or minus 6 percentage
points and for the results of adults or their family members who have
not received a second opinion in the past five years (1,473) is plus or
minus 4 percentage points. Unfortunately, there are several other
possible sources of error in polls or surveys that are probably more
serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. This includes
refusals to be interviewed (nonresponse), question wording and question
order, and weighting. It is impossible to quantify the errors that may
result from these factors. This online sample was not a probability
sample.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.
About the Survey
The Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Health-Care Poll
is an exclusive poll that is published in the award-winning Health
Industry Edition of The Wall Street Journal Online at
www.wsj.com/health.
About The Wall Street Journal Online
The Wall Street Journal Online at WSJ.com, published by Dow Jones
& Company (NYSE: DJ; www.dowjones.com), offers authoritative
analysis, breaking news and commentary from top industry journalists.
Launched in 1996, the Online Journal is the largest paid subscription
news site on the Web, with more than 689,000 subscribers world-wide.
The Online Journal provides in-depth business news and financial
information 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with insight and
analysis, including breaking business and technology news and analysis
from around the world. It draws on the Dow Jones network of more than
1,500 reporters and editors -- the largest staff of business and
financial journalists in the world. For the second consecutive year in
2003, the Online Journal received a WebAward for the "Best Newspaper
Web Site" and was also cited by Yahoo! Internet Life magazine as the
"Best Business News" site (2002 & 2001).
About Dow Jones & Company
In addition to The Wall Street Journal and its international and
online editions, Dow Jones & Company (NYSE: DJ; dowjones.com) also
publishes Barron's and the Far Eastern Economic Review, Dow Jones
Newswires, Dow Jones Indexes and the Ottaway group of community
newspapers. Dow Jones is co-owner with Reuters Group of Factiva, with
Hearst of SmartMoney and with NBC of the CNBC television operations in
Asia and Europe. Dow Jones also provides news content to CNBC and radio
stations in the U.S.
About Harris Interactive?
Harris Interactive Inc. (www.harrisinteractive.com), the 15th
largest and fastest-growing market research firm in the world, is a
Rochester, N.Y.-based global research company that blends premier
strategic consulting with innovative and efficient methods of
investigation, analysis and application. Known for The Harris Poll?
and for pioneering Internet-based research methods, Harris Interactive
conducts proprietary and public research to help its clients achieve
clear, material and enduring results.
Harris Interactive combines its intellectual capital, databases and
technology to advance market leadership through U.S. offices and wholly
owned subsidiaries: London-based HI Europe (www.hieurope.com), Paris-based Novatris (www.novatris.com),
Tokyo-based Harris Interactive Japan, through newly acquired
WirthlinWorldwide, a Reston, Virginia-based research and consultancy
firm ranked 25th largest in the world, and through an independent global network of affiliate market research companies. EOE M/F/D/V
To become a member of the Harris Poll OnlineSM and be invited to participate in future online surveys, visit www.harrispollonline.com.
|